A new Dubai law to establish a dispute resolution authority in the DIFC

A new Dubai law to establish a dispute resolution authority in the DIFC

A new Dubai Law (Dubai Law No. 7 of 2014) was enacted by His Highness Sheikh Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum and has come into force on 21 May 2014 (the "Law"). A statement was made by His Highness on 27 May 2014 announcing the Law and its objectives although a copy of the Law has just become available. The Law amends certain provisions of the law that established the Dubai International Financial Centre ("DIFC") (Dubai Law No. 9 of 2004) by mandating the establishment of a DIFC Disputes Resolution Authority that will be comprised of the existing DIFC Courts and what is referred to as the Arbitration Institute together with any other special purpose DIFC tribunals and dispute resolution bodies.
Background
The DIFC was established in 2004 pursuant to a number of UAE Federal Laws and Dubai Laws as a financial free zone within Dubai. A body called the DIFC Authority was established to oversee the strategic development, operational management and administration of the DIFC. In addition, the DIFC has its own body of law, its own courts and has been granted the authority to issue regulations in certain areas. An arbitration centre was also launched in 2008 as a joint venture with the London Court of International Arbitration (the "DIFC-LCIA Arbitration Centre").
Key amendments
The key provision of the new law is an amendment to Article 8 of Dubai Law No. 9 of 2004. The new law mandates the establishment of a Disputes Resolution Authority within the DIFC, which will exist alongside the DIFC Authority and the Dubai Financial Services Authority. The new Disputes Resolution Authority (the "Authority") will be headed by the DIFC Courts' Chief Justice (currently Michael Hwang, SC) and will be made up of the existing DIFC Courts, the "Arbitration Institute" and any other special purpose DIFC tribunals or dispute resolution bodies. It will also have a separate legal personality and will function without interference from any of the other DIFC bodies.
The new law does not specifically identify the Arbitration Institute, although it is likely to be the existing DIFC-LCIA Arbitration Centre. The new law also provides that the Arbitration Institute shall function independently according to a Constitution to be promulgated by the DIFC President and will have a Board of Trustees and a Chief Executive appointed by the Head of the new Authority. The functions of the Arbitration Institute will be set out in due course in its Constitution, but shall include:
  1. the promotion of the Arbitration Institute as a hub for the settlement of domestic and international disputes, and of disputes arising out of treaties, by arbitration, mediation, and other forms of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms ("ADR");
  2. the preparation and issuance of rules and procedures required to regulate the administration of arbitration, mediation, and other forms of ADR;
  3. the provision of courses and accreditation for arbitrators, mediators and other persons concerned with arbitration, mediation, and other forms of ADR; and
  4. entering into co-operation and joint venture agreements with any local, regional, or international centre, society or organisation specialised in arbitration and ADR.
The new Authority will also have the power to form an advisory committee of experts in the law and in dispute resolution, although no details are provided as to what role(s) such committees will undertake.
Comment
The new Law represents an interesting development for the DIFC. In a short space of time both the DIFC Courts and the DIFC-LCIA Arbitration Centre have developed excellent reputations as places to resolve disputes in not only the DIFC but the wider Middle East region. It is not yet clear how the new Authority will function, particularly the new Arbitration Institute, but anything that seeks to build on the successes to date of the DIFC Courts and the DIFC-LCIA Arbitration Centre is likely to be positive. The litigation and arbitration community in the DIFC will await further details of the new Authority with interest.

  • Craig Shepherd, Stuart Paterson, Caroline Kehoe, Mike McClure and Anees Naim
  • United Arab Emirates
  • June 4 2014
Lexology

Comments

Post a Comment

You may comment here

Popular posts from this blog

Vicarious performance and Privity in Construction Contracts

Vicarious performance is quite common in construction projects. Vicarious performance refers to the performance of contract or part of it by a third party. It is quite rare for contractors to perform construction contracts without receiving help from specialized subcontractors especially in cases of purpose-built premises such as hospitals, factories, etc. Such projects require diversity of expertise that one contractor rarely acquires. Construction projects are known for their multi-contractual relations. Under the traditional construction procurement, employers start by signing a service agreement with an architect or designing engineer. The latter prepares the drawings, specifications, bill of quantities and any other particular documents. The tender process starts with the help of the engineer who may have a significant role in selecting the right contractor for the project. The employer will then sign a construction contract with the contractor who will likely subcontract part
Read more

Is Online Arbitration available under the UAE Law?

Is Online Arbitration available under the UAE Law? Online arbitration covers all stages of arbitration, including the exchange of statements, the several types of hearing and notification. The new UAE Arbitration Law, Federal Law 6/2018), expanded the use of electronic technology in Arbitration. It starts with the use of electronic emails for the purpose of writing the arbitration agreement (Article 7/2).   Arbitrators tend to accept electronic submissions alone with no need for print copies. In order to avoid any unfavourable legal consequences, they tend to get the parties to agree on this approach and/or include it in their first procedural order. Personally, I prefer electronic copies of statements as I can access them anywhere and at any time. I can also search through the documents easily and swiftly.   As for the online hearing, the new law made it clear that online hearing is possible unless it is precluded by the agreement of the parties. Article (28/2) states that “Un
Read more

The legal effect of Covid-19 (Coronavirus Pandemic) on Construction Contracts under UAE Law

During the Covid-19 Pandemic, some construction projects experienced interruptions or slowing in the pace of progress. Others were suspended or terminated. Naturally, the question here becomes about the legal consequences.  Under UAE Civil Law, there are some articles that are helpful. I am quoting them below. Covid-19 may be classified as a force majeure case. It was not foreseeable at the time of making the contract and it affects all our life aspects. If, as a result, all or part of a project is terminated, articles 273 & 893 will apply. The contract will be set aside and the contractor will be entitled to the value of the work which he has completed and the expenses he has incurred in the performance thereof up to the amount of the benefit the employer has derived therefrom. Obviously, the contractor will be entitled to be only paid up to the value of the benefit conferred on the employer . The contractor will not be able to claim compensation for its losses as there
Read more