Vicarious performance and Privity in Construction Contracts


Vicarious performance is quite common in construction projects. Vicarious performance refers to the performance of contract or part of it by a third party. It is quite rare for contractors to perform construction contracts without receiving help from specialized subcontractors especially in cases of purpose-built premises such as hospitals, factories, etc. Such projects require diversity of expertise that one contractor rarely acquires. Construction projects are known for their multi-contractual relations. Under the traditional construction procurement, employers start by signing a service agreement with an architect or designing engineer. The latter prepares the drawings, specifications, bill of quantities and any other particular documents. The tender process starts with the help of the engineer who may have a significant role in selecting the right contractor for the project. The employer will then sign a construction contract with the contractor who will likely subcontract part of the work.

In principle, employers do not have a direct contract action against sub-contractors and vice versa. This is due to the long-established principle of privity, under which only parties to the contract can claim its enforcement. In the normal course of circumstances, employers and subcontractors do not have a direct contractual link. Over the years, the privity principle was subjected to a number of restrictions. Perhaps the UK Contracts (Third Parties Rights) Act 1999 is an obvious example. In construction cases, courts and arbitrators alike seem to be too conservative when it comes to the application of the principle of privity. They seem to be reluctant to abandon its rigorous application and, thus, employers will be disallowed from suing sub-contractors for their defective workmanship or delayed performance; and, on the other hand, subcontractors cannot claim payment from employers directly.

This traditional attitude has recently been visited in some cases. Some courts seem to be well prepared to find ways to circumvent the rigorous application of the principle of privity in constructions cases. The well-known Hong Kong case of Hong Kong Housing Authority v. Rotegear Corporation Ltd. [2009] HKCFI 625 and the Dubai court of Cassation (213/2008) & 266/2008 cases seem to be good examples. It is the aim of this paper to find out how the United Arab Emirates (UAE) courts can soften the rigid application of the privity principle so that employers are not left uncompensated for the subcontractors’ defective workmanship; and the latter are not left unpaid for the conforming work received by the employers.

For the complete article, please see 
"Masadeh, A. (2014)  “Vicarious Performance and Privity in Construction under the law of United Arab Emirates” International Construction Law Review (ICLR), Volume 31, issue 1, p.108."

Comments

Post a Comment

You may comment here

Popular posts from this blog

Is Online Arbitration available under the UAE Law?

Is Online Arbitration available under the UAE Law? Online arbitration covers all stages of arbitration, including the exchange of statements, the several types of hearing and notification. The new UAE Arbitration Law, Federal Law 6/2018), expanded the use of electronic technology in Arbitration. It starts with the use of electronic emails for the purpose of writing the arbitration agreement (Article 7/2).   Arbitrators tend to accept electronic submissions alone with no need for print copies. In order to avoid any unfavourable legal consequences, they tend to get the parties to agree on this approach and/or include it in their first procedural order. Personally, I prefer electronic copies of statements as I can access them anywhere and at any time. I can also search through the documents easily and swiftly.   As for the online hearing, the new law made it clear that online hearing is possible unless it is precluded by the agreement of the parties. Article (28/2) states...
Read more

The legal effect of Covid-19 (Coronavirus Pandemic) on Construction Contracts under UAE Law

During the Covid-19 Pandemic, some construction projects experienced interruptions or slowing in the pace of progress. Others were suspended or terminated. Naturally, the question here becomes about the legal consequences.  Under UAE Civil Law, there are some articles that are helpful. I am quoting them below. Covid-19 may be classified as a force majeure case. It was not foreseeable at the time of making the contract and it affects all our life aspects. If, as a result, all or part of a project is terminated, articles 273 & 893 will apply. The contract will be set aside and the contractor will be entitled to the value of the work which he has completed and the expenses he has incurred in the performance thereof up to the amount of the benefit the employer has derived therefrom. Obviously, the contractor will be entitled to be only paid up to the value of the benefit conferred on the employer . The contractor will not be able to claim compensation for its losses as th...
Read more